Hvem er det som trekker i trådene og nekter oss retten til fri debatt?

Dette er ferskt stoff fra professor Fetzer, og jeg siterer fra hans ferske artikkel på Veterans Today:

The Holocaust Narrative: Politics Trumps Science

by Jim Fetzer

“The fastest way to get expelled from a British university is by saying you are looking at chemical evidence for how Zyklon was used in World War II, with a discussion of how delousing technology functioned in the German World War II labour camps”—Nicholas Kollerstrom.

For more on the book,
click BREAKING THE SPELL

The author of this refreshing scientific study of the Holocaust, Nicholas Kollerstrom, may be the most honorable man whom I have ever had the pleasure to know.

In response to PM David Cameron’s denunciation of 7/7 and 9/11 skeptics as on a par with ISIS, he went to Scotland Yard with a copy of Terror on the Tube (3rd ed., 2011) and turned himself in.

Scotland Yard declined the honor, but this act–which symbolically castrated the PM’s outrageous stance–was a striking illustration of his ability to tackle a problem by going right at it.

A distinguished historian of science with multiple degrees, including from Cambridge, he has published on 9/11 and especially 7/7, about which he appears to be the world’s leading expert.

When his attention turned to research on the use of Zykon B as a delousing agent in the labor camps run by the Germans during World War II, however, he was treated as an outcast.

He lost his position at University College London, which he had held for 15 years, where university officials did not bother to extend the opportunity of a rebuttal before they sacked him.

He and I both spoke at the recent conference, “Academic Freedom: Are there limits to inquiry? JFK, 9/11 and the Holocaust”, where this book reports the results of the research for which he was banned. The book, a stunning historic expose, has just appeared. I endorse it with my highest recommendation.

The Holocaust – Myth and Reality

The situation is completely absurd. No subject generates responses as extreme and irrational as what has come to be known as “the Holocaust”. Unlike any other event in human history, including even the most sacred religious beliefs, for anyone to question, dispute or deny its occurrence qualifies as “a hate crime,” where Holocaust denial is even a prosecutable offense in certain jurisdictions. Unlike any other, this crime involves the expression of forbidden thoughts about a subject that has become taboo.

…

De som ønsker å lese seg opp på professor Nicholas Kollerstrom, kan gjøre det her, hvorfra jeg siterer kort.

Nicholas Kollerstrom (born 13 December 1946) is an English writer and historian of science. Formerly an honorary research fellow at University College London (UCL) and BBC lunar gardening correspondent, he is the author of several books, including Gardening and Planting by the Moon (an annual series beginning 1980), Newton’s Forgotten Lunar Theory (2000), Crop Circles (2002), andTerror on the Tube (2009).

Kollerstrom has been involved in a variety of issues as a political activist. He helped to set up the Belgrano Action Group after the sinking of the ARA General Belgrano by the British Navy during the Falklands War in 1982. His book, Terror on the Tube, argued that the 7 July 2005 London bombings were not carried out by the men accused of them. His UCL fellowship was withdrawn in April 2008 after he posted what he said was revisionist material about the Auschwitz concentration camp on websites known for theirHolocaust denial.^[1]

Voltaire skrev smart om å finne ut av hvem som forsøker hindre kritikk

Zyklon B brukt til utryddelse av lus og lopper

Jeg re-siterer:

When his attention turned to research on the use of Zyklon B as a delousing agent in the labor camps run by the Germans during World War II, however, he was treated as an outcast.

He lost his position at University College London, which he had held for 15 years, where university officials did not bother to extend the opportunity of a rebuttal before they sacked him.

Han ble kastet hodestups ut av universitetet i London uten en eneste begrunnelse. Er det en forklaring på hvorfor ingen norske forskere i høye stillinger har turt å åpne kjeften? For det er jo bare to valg det er snakk om. Enten er de stokke dumme, eller så er de feige. Det finnes meget gode grunner for mainstream forskere fra offentlige institusjoner i vårt land til å fortelle det norske folk hva Zyklon B ble brukt til i Norge.

Det er nemlig et betimelig spørsmål som må stilles. Hvor mange millioner ble gasset i hjel i Norge under krigen? Det må ha vært mange. Her er opplysninger fra I. G. Farben, den tyske produsenten av Zyklon B om hvor mye de sendte til forskjellige mottakere:

Det nevnte Norsk Skadedyrkontroll er nevnt i norske oppslagsverk. Her er litt fra boka Apoteklovgivningen 1672-1936 : samling av lover, resolusjoner, skrivelser m. v. om Apotekvesenet, tilvirkning, opbevaring og handel med gifter og lægemidler m. v. : med henvisninger og anmerkninger som ble utgitt i 1936:

Det er tragisk hvor lite Kari og Ola kan om vår historie. Det er like trist at flertallet av dem er så redde for å stikke seg ut fra massen og så totalt ødelagt av egen kognitive dissonans, at det er omtrent umulig å bryte gjennom skallet de har bygget omkring seg selv for å beskytte seg mot sannheten.